Loading
Loading...
Logo
Net Metering & Interconnection
Energy & Agriculture
Energy-Water Nexus
Power Plants
Kill Fish
Local Permitting
Biofuels
TELL A FRIEND
Share the energy — tell a friend about NNEC! click here »
KEEP UP-TO-DATE
RSS
RSS
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Google Reader or Homepage
What is RSS? Click here to find out
The Network for New Energy Choices is a program of .

© 2004- GRACE
 
The Rush to Ethanol:
Can Ethanol Save the American Farmer?

Although some farmers are excited by rising corn prices, the current ethanol boom is intensifying the concentration of ownership and the industrialization of agricultural lands, resulting in a revenue drain from rural communities.

The ethanol industry enjoys government subsidies on many levels. Without these subsidies, corn-based ethanol would not be feasible in the United States. Most ethanol subsidies are directed toward multi-national corporations with large profit margins and thick political ties. While higher commodity prices and cooperatively owned ethanol refineries could be a boon to independenet farmers, without safeguards, ethanol industry growth could further concentrate agribusiness, draining the economic health of rural communities.

Corn Farm Program Payments

Corn is the crop that receives the most farm program payments in the U.S., receiving more than $51 billion between 1995 and 2005.

Farm policy and agribusiness

Agribusiness corporations have historically benefited from federal farm policy that has encouraged corn overproduction. The largest, most intensively farmed corn operations receive the lion’s share of corn commodity program payments. From 1995 to 2005, 70 percent of federal corn program payments received went to the top ten percent of corn producers.

Ethanol subsidies

Corn subsidies keep the cost of ethanol production artificially low for industrial producers. Moreover, the main recipients of ethanol production subsidies are not independent farmers either. For example, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) received over $10 billion in subsidies between 1980 and 1997 because of the $0.51 per gallon ethanol tax break

 
| Contact Us | Jobs | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sister Sites|
 

Report Summary | PDF 747k
Full Report | PDF 2.8 MB

A comprehensive report that provides analysis and recommendations for U.S. biofuels and transportation policies.

The report was co-authored by the Network for New Energy Choices, Food & Water Watch, and the Institute for Energy and the Environment at Vermont Law School